Recently, a few people have been mentioning how they think that there should be some form of registration or licensing for airguns; especially in light of the recent incidents where one child died, and another was taken to hospital.
I have given this subject some thought, and come up with what I think could be the basis for self-regulation plan for airgunners. I sent this to the mods/admins yesterday, for their comments, and even including the negative points that were pointed out, it got a generally good response.
Think it through after you read it; at first, it appears that this scheme is giving away some of our current rights/freedom to use airguns - but, I think we need to be proactive, and if we can come up with a workable solution for regulation it will be a benefit to us.
After the childs death, it is not going to take many more airgun incidents before some 'suit' in the government decides to try and ban airguns completely, or limit the muzzle energy to 7.5 ft/lb as is the case in Germany.
Have a read through this, and give it some thought, if you can think of anything that could be helpful (either added, changed or taken out) then post it.
If you think it's a sh1t idea, or a good idea, then post that too, with reasons, if you have one.
Some of the points that the mods raised, are right at the bottom of this post.
A proposal for self regulation and licencing by airgunners.
This is an initial outline of a proposal for voluntary airgun licencing and registration scheme.
A voluntary licencing and/or registration scheme would hae benefits for the police, air gun users, and indirectly, for the public as a whole.
Among the benefits for the police, would be -
More accurate details of the number of active air gun users.
More accurate details of the addresses/locations of air gun users.
A better idea of the safety precautions that airgun users take.
Closer monitoring of air gun use.
Greater confidence that air gun users have an understanding of legal
and technical issues relating to the sport/hobby.
Greater confidence that volunteers in the scheme are adhering to
current laws and regulations.
Benefits for airgun users -
Details of airuns recorded in case of loss/theft.
Shows that they are responsible owners/users.
Give them a basic knowledge of airgun legislation.
Could provide a stepping stone to SGC/FAC.
Increase awareness of the dangers of airguns.
Benefits to the public -
Shows that police and airgun users are proactive.
Shows that airgun users are not all thugs/vandals
Reassurance that .minimum safety levels can be measured
and adhered to.
Confidence that offences/misdemeanors will be dealt with
promptly and effectively.
Registration and licencing.
This could operate on a tier level; the higher the level that the user achieves, would demonstrate a greater understanding of the problems faced by the police when dealing with potential offences/safety issues.
Level 1. (possibly carried out online via the local police web-site)
Simple registration of airguns. Details kept to a minimum, but including -
Name
Address
Make/model of airgun(s)
Serial number(s) of airgun(s)
Level 2. (A short course (one day or less) which would include)
Registration of airguns
Safety check carried out on the airgun(s)
Airgun law
Knife law
Airgun safety
Airgun maintenance
Basic marksmanship principles
Different uses of airguns
ie. Pest control/hunting
Target
FT/HFT
Paintball
Basic first aid techniques (specific to airgun/knife injuries)
Identification of airgun legal quarry species
Level 3. (Includes previous levels)
Proof that airguns are securely stored in a gun safe
Demonstrate more detailed knowledge of airgun/firearm law
Demonstrate more detailed knowledge of airgun/firearm safety
A level 3 'licence holder' might then be allowed to own/use an airgun with a greater muzzle energy
than 12 ft/lb (possibly up to 25 ft/lb) in the same manner that a current FAC owner would be. This would in effect, be a 'lite' or 'cutdown' version of a current section 1 FAC licence, and would also be an incentive to go through this process.
Level 1 could be a free service, as it is carried out online, or at the front desk of any local police station.
Level 2 & 3 could incur a small nominal fee to cover the course costs/extra administration, and the issue of a 'cutdown' FAC (airgun specific) licence for airguns over 12 ft/lb.
Cost (to police/government/participants)
Time (FLO already busy, how long it takes to implement)
Lack of interest from airgunners
Govenment/public/police unwilling to allow more powerful airguns
What level of security would be needed for airgun storage (maximum/minimum)
The number of airguns already 'in the wild' (estimated 4-6 million)
Problems with guns currently unknowingly over the limit
There were other points made, but the idea is for you lot to think about this, see what we come up with, and then if we think it's worth it, post it on other forums, and see where it goes.
There is not really any representation for airgunners per se, in the UK, unlike in other countries, and if we just sit around, other people will make rules and regulations that we don't like, but then it may be too late to do anything about it.
Once the government ban something, it rarely becomes unbanned!